Which is faster and more private? Both Signal and WhatsApp use end-to-end encryption (E2EE), but their approaches to privacy and performance differ. Here’s the quick breakdown:
- Encryption Speed: Both apps encrypt text messages almost instantly. Media files differ – WhatsApp compresses images to send faster, while Signal prioritizes quality.
- Privacy: Signal collects minimal data (just your phone number) and uses "Sealed Sender" to hide metadata. WhatsApp collects more user data, including location and usage patterns, and shares it with Meta.
- User Data: Signal is run by a non-profit and avoids data sharing. WhatsApp, owned by Meta, retains and shares non-encrypted data with third parties.
Quick Comparison Table:
| Feature | Signal | |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption Protocol | Signal Protocol (open-source) | Signal Protocol (proprietary) |
| Metadata Protection | Yes (Sealed Sender) | No |
| Data Collection | Phone number only | Phone number, device info, location, etc. |
| Data Sharing | None | Yes (shared within Meta) |
| Image Compression | Minimal | High |
Takeaway: If privacy is your priority, Signal is the better choice. For faster media sharing with some trade-offs in data privacy, WhatsApp works well. Pairing either app with a temporary phone number (e.g., from MobileSMS.io) can further protect your identity and privacy.
How Encryption Works in Messaging Apps
What Encryption Is and Why You Need It
Encryption works by converting your messages into ciphertext using complex mathematical algorithms. For instance, when you send a message through apps like Signal or WhatsApp, your device instantly scrambles your words into ciphertext that would appear as gibberish to anyone trying to intercept it. This process happens almost instantly, shielding your conversations from potential eavesdroppers, including hackers, government entities, or even the app providers themselves.
End-to-end encryption (E2EE) takes this a step further. With E2EE, your message is encrypted on your device, stays encrypted as it travels across the internet, and is only decrypted once it reaches your recipient’s device. This ensures that only you and the person you’re communicating with can read the message – no one else, not even the app developers, can access it.
Given that 81% of Americans worry about how companies handle their data [1], encryption acts as a crucial safeguard. It not only blocks unauthorized access to your private messages but also flags any tampering that might occur during transmission.
Signal Protocol vs. WhatsApp Protocol
While both Signal and WhatsApp rely on end-to-end encryption based on the Signal Protocol, they implement it differently, which directly impacts their security and privacy features.
WhatsApp, used by over 2 billion people monthly, adopted the Signal Protocol to secure its message content. However, there’s a key difference: Signal’s encryption is open-source, allowing cybersecurity experts worldwide to inspect and verify its security. In contrast, WhatsApp’s encryption implementation is proprietary, meaning its code is not publicly accessible for review.
Another major difference lies in how each app manages encryption beyond the message itself. Signal incorporates features like "Sealed Sender", which further protects communication by concealing metadata and ensuring that even if a session key is compromised, past messages remain secure. WhatsApp, however, focuses primarily on encrypting the message content but handles other types of user data differently.
"WhatsApp collects and shares, when required, large amounts of private information that is not encrypted, like your profile picture, your location, your contacts, when you send a message, when you stop, who’s in your group chats, and so on", says Meredith Whittaker, President of Signal.
These differences in protocol design not only affect user privacy but also influence how efficiently messages are encrypted and decrypted. The layers of encryption and the way data is managed can impact the speed and overall performance of the app.
Encryption Speed: Signal vs WhatsApp
Message Encryption and Decryption Speed
When it comes to encrypting and decrypting messages, both Signal and WhatsApp perform at lightning speed. Since WhatsApp uses the Signal Protocol for its end-to-end encryption, the core encryption process is almost identical between the two apps. In fact, the encryption itself happens so quickly that any delays you notice are typically due to network latency, not the encryption process.
However, things get a bit different when media files are involved. WhatsApp compresses photos before sending them, which reduces file size and speeds up delivery. Signal, on the other hand, prioritizes image quality and applies only minimal compression. This difference becomes more noticeable as the volume of messages or media increases.
Performance with Heavy Message Traffic
Both apps handle high-volume messaging, like in group chats, by relying on the efficiency of the Signal Protocol. WhatsApp benefits from its massive infrastructure, which is designed to support billions of users. This ensures that even during peak usage times, the app can maintain smooth and secure communication without significant slowdowns.
How Your Device and Network Affect Encryption Speed
Encryption speed isn’t just about the app – it also depends on your device and network. Older devices may take a bit longer to handle cryptographic processes, and having a stable internet connection (at least 128 kbps) is crucial for seamless performance.
The type of content you send also plays a role. Larger files and high-resolution media require more processing power and bandwidth. Signal’s minimal compression means it demands more bandwidth for media transfers, whereas WhatsApp’s compression reduces the strain on both bandwidth and processing, though it sacrifices some image quality in the process.
Privacy and Data Collection Differences
What Data Signal Collects
Signal takes a straightforward approach to data collection. During setup, it only asks for your phone number – no device details, usage stats, or location data. Operated by the Signal Technology Foundation, a non-profit organization, Signal isn’t driven by the need to monetize user data or share it with advertisers.
"Signal is designed to never collect or store any sensitive information. Signal messages and calls cannot be accessed by us or other third parties because they are always end-to-end encrypted, private, and secure." – Signal
Signal also includes a feature called "Sealed Sender", which hides metadata from prying eyes. This makes it nearly impossible for Signal – or anyone else – to track your communication patterns.
What Data WhatsApp Collects
WhatsApp, on the other hand, collects a wide range of user data. This includes device information, IP addresses, usage habits, and even location data. All of this is shared within Meta’s ecosystem for operational and advertising purposes, going far beyond what’s necessary for basic messaging.
The platform also responds differently to law enforcement requests. In 2024, Meta disclosed data in response to over 78% of law enforcement requests involving WhatsApp. This highlights how much non-encrypted information the app retains about its users.
These differences in data collection not only affect privacy but also influence how the apps function in the background, which can impact your overall experience.
How Privacy Policies Affect Encryption Speed
While privacy policies don’t directly impact the speed of encryption, they do influence background activity. Both Signal and WhatsApp use the same Signal Protocol for end-to-end encryption, so the process of encrypting and decrypting messages performs equally well in both apps.
The difference lies in what happens behind the scenes. WhatsApp’s extensive data collection means the app is continuously gathering and processing information about your device and usage. This doesn’t slow down encryption itself, but it does increase the amount of background processing your device handles. Signal’s minimalist data approach, by contrast, keeps background activity to a minimum.
| Privacy Aspect | Signal | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Collection | Phone number only | Phone number, device info, usage patterns, location |
| Metadata Protection | Yes (Sealed Sender) | No |
| Data Sharing | None | Yes (within Meta services) |
| Ownership | Non-profit foundation | Meta (Facebook) |
Signal’s limited data collection not only reduces background processing but also minimizes potential security risks. The less data an app collects and stores, the less appealing it becomes to hackers, and the fewer opportunities exist for breaches or unauthorized access.
sbb-itb-5a89343
Real-World Uses for Privacy Tools
Protecting Your Accounts with Temporary Phone Numbers
Apps like Signal and WhatsApp require a phone number to set up an account, but sharing your personal number might not always be the safest option. For situations like this, temporary phone numbers offer an extra layer of privacy.
MobileSMS.io provides real SIM-card-based phone numbers that work seamlessly with Signal, WhatsApp, and over 1,200 other platforms. Unlike VoIP numbers, these SIM-based options are widely accepted by messaging apps and other services, keeping your personal number out of the equation.
MobileSMS.io offers flexible plans, whether you need a number for a single use or a longer period. This is especially useful for business professionals managing multiple client accounts or digital nomads who want to keep personal and professional communications separate. Plus, it helps cut down on spam and unwanted calls to your main number.
Using a temporary number not only safeguards your privacy but also ensures peace of mind in situations where confidentiality is key.
When You Need Secure Messaging and Verification
Pairing encrypted messaging with temporary numbers takes privacy to the next level. Journalists, activists, and cybersecurity professionals often rely on this combination to protect their identities.
"I regard Signal as the best of the encrypted message platforms. Usually when Signal is insecure the issue is not Signal, but on the cellular and Wi-Fi networks." – Calvin Deutschbein, Assistant Professor of Computer Science
For remote workers handling sensitive projects or client communications, this setup is also invaluable. It ensures that private information stays secure, even in professional settings.
In high-risk situations – like whistleblowing, investigative journalism, or political activism – this approach offers unmatched protection. Signal’s minimal data collection combined with a temporary number from MobileSMS.io creates a robust shield for anonymity.
Even for everyday users, this strategy is practical. Whether you’re signing up for a new service, trying out a dating app, or using a platform you’re unsure about, a temporary number keeps your primary contact safe from spam while encrypted messaging guarantees your conversations stay private.
Conclusion
Signal and WhatsApp both rely on the Signal Protocol for end-to-end encryption, ensuring messages are secure during transmission. However, their approaches to privacy differ significantly. Signal takes privacy a step further with tools like Sealed Sender, which conceals metadata – even from Signal itself. WhatsApp, on the other hand, while maintaining strong encryption, collects far more user data and shares it with Meta and other third parties. This stark contrast in data handling highlights the broader conversation around privacy and the trade-offs users face.
Interestingly, data reveals that while 60% of users are aware of WhatsApp’s encryption, over 30% have stopped using messaging apps altogether due to privacy concerns. This demonstrates the ongoing tension between convenience and safeguarding personal information.
For those seeking an added layer of privacy, using a temporary, SIM-based number from MobileSMS.io can be a game-changer. By keeping your personal number out of data collection systems, this method strengthens privacy for both professional and sensitive communications. It addresses not just message encryption but also protects your identity, creating a more comprehensive solution.
Ultimately, whether you choose Signal or WhatsApp depends on your privacy priorities. Pairing either app with a temporary phone number from MobileSMS.io can significantly boost your personal data protection.
FAQs
How does Signal’s encryption differ from WhatsApp, and what does this mean for privacy?
Both Signal and WhatsApp rely on the Signal Protocol to provide end-to-end encryption, ensuring that only the intended recipient can read your messages. But when it comes to user privacy, the two platforms take very different approaches.
Signal prioritizes privacy above all else, collecting minimal user data and steering clear of storing metadata. On the other hand, while WhatsApp uses the same encryption protocol, it gathers more user data and shares metadata with its parent company, Meta. So, while your messages are secure on both platforms, Signal offers a more privacy-conscious approach, making it a stronger option for those who value data security and personal privacy.
Why use a temporary phone number with apps like Signal or WhatsApp to protect your privacy?
Using a temporary phone number with messaging apps like Signal or WhatsApp is a practical way to safeguard your privacy. It helps keep your personal number out of reach, lowering the chances of spam, phishing attempts, and other unwelcome disruptions. This approach is particularly handy when signing up for new services or interacting with people you don’t know well.
Think of temporary numbers as a protective barrier for your personal details. Once you’re finished with them, you can simply discard them, adding an extra layer of security and anonymity. In a world where protecting personal data is more important than ever, this straightforward step can make a noticeable difference.
How do Signal and WhatsApp compare when it comes to image quality and sending speed for media files?
Signal and WhatsApp take different approaches when it comes to handling media files, particularly balancing image quality and sending speed. WhatsApp focuses on speed by compressing images significantly, which makes sending quicker but often at the expense of image clarity. While there is an HD option available for sending images, it isn’t always consistent or accessible across all devices.
Signal, by contrast, uses less aggressive compression, which helps maintain better image quality. The trade-off? Larger file sizes can mean slightly longer sending times. So, if speed and convenience are your top priorities, WhatsApp might suit you better. But if you care more about preserving image detail, Signal is the better choice for sharing media.